[rfc-i] Supporting both ease-of-entry and un-labeled list items in v3

Nico Williams nico at cryptonector.com
Fri Feb 14 11:08:16 PST 2014

On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke at gmx.de> wrote:
> On 2014-02-14 19:29, Jim Schaad wrote:
>> I for one would more or less like to get rid of all of the reasons for
>> using
>> vspace.  I find it very confusing about what it is supposed to be doing
>> because it does not follow what I consider to be logical structure.
> +1

+1 too (obviously).  With the caveat that I'd still like to keep
<vspace> just in case we missed something (and, if the goal is that v3
be a superset of v2, because of that goal).

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list