[rfc-i] On backwards compatibility for v2

Dave Crocker dhc at dcrocker.net
Tue Feb 11 08:13:06 PST 2014

On 2/11/2014 12:01 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> v1 is a subset of v2. So, by definition, what processes v2 will process
> v1, assuming the v1 input isn't broken in the first place.

And in case it hasn't been clear, that's exactly the same model I'm 
espousing for v3, with respect to v2 (and v1.)

Superset, not separate.


Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list