[rfc-i] On backwards compatibility for v2

Nico Williams nico at cryptonector.com
Mon Feb 10 18:33:33 PST 2014

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:40 PM, Ted Lemon <mellon at fugue.com> wrote:
> On Feb 10, 2014, at 5:56 PM, Nico Williams <nico at cryptonector.com> wrote:
>> For now we should adopt
>> backwards-compatibility is a requirement, albeit a weak one in that
>> we'll re-open the matter if any difficulties arise in delivering it
> I think that was Julian's original position... :)

I've lost track.  At any rate, he convinced me :)

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list