[rfc-i] On backwards compatibility for v2

Ted Lemon mellon at fugue.com
Mon Feb 10 15:40:53 PST 2014

On Feb 10, 2014, at 5:56 PM, Nico Williams <nico at cryptonector.com> wrote:
> For now we should adopt
> backwards-compatibility is a requirement, albeit a weak one in that
> we'll re-open the matter if any difficulties arise in delivering it

I think that was Julian's original position... :)

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list