[rfc-i] On backwards compatibility for v2

Dave Crocker dhc at dcrocker.net
Mon Feb 10 15:16:15 PST 2014

On 2/10/2014 2:31 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> *My* main reason for trying to be compatible is about something else
> though: once we decide that breaking things is OK, we'll likely have big
> vocabulary design debates that are common when designing new XML
> vocabularies, and there *will* be people showing up asking to switch to
> (X)HTML if we break things anyway. We can avoid all of this by adding a
> v2 compat constraint.

interesting point.


Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list