[rfc-i] what about draft-peterson-informational-normativity ?
mellon at fugue.com
Wed Aug 20 12:53:33 PDT 2014
On Aug 20, 2014, at 3:50 PM, Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor) <rse at rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> I don't know about general community appetite, but I can certainly
> attest that this would make my life as RSE easier if I had acceptable
> definitions to the terms you clarify in the draft.
If you think it's useful, Heather, we could AD-sponsor it and see what the IETF and IESG think. If the community says "hell no" then that's one answer. If they say nothing, that's another. It wouldn't surprise me if there were support for such a document.
More information about the rfc-interest