[rfc-i] [irtf-discuss] RFCs accepted journal articles

Joe Touch touch at isi.edu
Fri May 3 09:14:59 PDT 2013

On 5/2/2013 11:53 PM, Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo) wrote:
>> Other streams may or may not be considered peer-reviewed (I would not
>> consider IAB documents as such), but independent submissions are
>> generally not (they only purpose of the one review they get is to make
>> sure they're on-topic and not bogus).
> FWIW: There is a lot of review happening for IAB documents from the
> IAB itself, from members in IAB programs (if the document belongs to a
> program) and also from the IETF community since the documents are
> typically last called.

That's community feedback, not peer review.

Peer review includes a recommendation not to publish, and non-junk 
venues have rejection rates >50% (typically around 30% or less).


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list