[rfc-i] Requirement for "clear printing"

Tony Hansen tony at att.com
Tue Feb 19 09:10:02 PST 2013

On 2/19/2013 11:55 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> a) "Clear printing" is too vague, and we should say something more 
> like "Easily legible printing on A4 or US Letter size paper, whenever 
> possible without splitting figures and tables." 


> b) There is a separate question of whether we also require identical 
> pagination on those two paper sizes. 

The current format gives the same pagination on both paper sizes. If we 
have a plain printable format with the characteristics in (a), it should 
continue to have the same pagination on the two paper sizes.

> c) There is a separate question whether we also require fine-grain 
> markers such as paragraph numbers.

Paragraph numbers are intrinsic to the semantic content and shouldn't 
require any specific markup.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/attachments/20130219/84aa6085/attachment.htm>

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list