[rfc-i] [IAB Trac] #266: Requirement for "Clear Printing"

Brian E Carpenter brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com
Sat Feb 16 00:14:08 PST 2013

On 15/02/2013 18:31, Marc Blanchet wrote:
> Le 2013-02-15 à 13:18, Joel M. Halpern a écrit :
>> I guess I am missing something.
>> It seems to me that in terms of how people talk about items within an RFC, I think we would want to encourage use of section and paragraph discussion and discourage use of page discussion, since page clearly will not work for all the people in a discussion.
>> As such, I have trouble seeing why we would want a requirement to make page references work well.
> +1.

Maybe you missed the point that this would be about the canonical format.

Obviously, page numbers and line numbers are irrelevant for a reflowable
format, but where is it written that the reflowable format is the
canonical format?


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list