[rfc-i] Allowing unnumbered t items in a list

Dave Crocker dhc at dcrocker.net
Tue Dec 17 11:30:53 PST 2013

On 12/17/2013 11:05 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2013-12-17 19:49, Dave Crocker wrote:
>> On 12/17/2013 10:14 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
>>> You are re-inventing the wheel; this was discussed a few years ago and
>>> we came to the conclusion that we want to support list item (<lt>)
>>> elements in addition to <t> elements. See thread around
>>> <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xml2rfc/current/msg02010.html>.
>> I think the point of deviation to that construct is that the 'list' is
>> not indented.
> ?

very sorry.  i hadn't known about <lt> and my eye skipped over your 
reference to it in your original note.

yeah, that looks like it would handle the current case.


Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list