[rfc-i] RFC Production Center request for unnumbered sections

Alice Russo arusso at amsl.com
Wed Dec 11 16:03:19 PST 2013

Hi Jim,

I added http://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/trac/ticket/105 to the xml2rfc issuetracker at the request of the RSE because it has a tie-in with the future style guide, draft-flanagan-style.

It's fine with me for it to be grouped with v3 vocabulary changes.


On Dec 11, 2013, at 12:16 PM, Jim Schaad wrote:

> The RFC PC has requested that this change be made in the v2 format.
> Jim
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Paul Hoffman [mailto:paul.hoffman at vpnc.org]
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 11:54 AM
>> To: Jim Schaad
>> Cc: RFC Interest
>> Subject: Re: [rfc-i] RFC Production Center request for unnumbered sections
>> On Dec 11, 2013, at 10:45 AM, Jim Schaad <ietf at augustcellars.com> wrote:
>>> The request springs from some of the changes that are being looked at
> for
>> how sections are done in the newer proposed format.
>> That seems fine (but not yet reflected in the Wiki page for that format),
> but it
>> doesn't explain why you're trying to get it changed in the v2 format.
>> --Paul Hoffman=
> _______________________________________________
> rfc-interest mailing list
> rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list