[rfc-i] Notes on "revisable format"
paul.hoffman at vpnc.org
Tue Sep 25 07:42:48 PDT 2012
On Sep 25, 2012, at 7:36 AM, Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor) <rse at rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> Interesting. I had taken out the "currently's" for much the reasons you
> both suggest, and then found that some of the pre-readers couldn't apply
> the descriptions to what was actually being done today.
How important is it for this document to help educate people who are not aware of what the RFC editor does today?
> I like Dave's definition also, but what about the others? Are they
> sufficiently clear with out the current examples?
Yes. In specific, completely removing the "Currently" from the "submission format" section would fix the problem better than my rewording.
More information about the rfc-interest