[rfc-i] verifying where we do/don't have consensus

Ole Jacobsen ole at cisco.com
Thu May 31 09:18:41 PDT 2012

Before we can measure consensus I would like to see a "bigger picture" 
discussion of what it is exactly we are trying to achieve. It has been 
suggested, for example, that "real graphics," (maybe line drawings as 
the ones found in patent applications) are "highly desirable," but I 
have not seen much discussion about this as functional "requirement" 
(and I use that word loosely). Instead, I see a lot of detailed 
technical discussion about HTML, XML and the like, all important 
stuff, but to me these are "engineering details" and not overall 
design and architecture discussions.

Maybe I am the only one who feels this way?


Ole J. Jacobsen
Editor and Publisher,  The Internet Protocol Journal
Cisco Systems
Tel: +1 408-527-8972   Mobile: +1 415-370-4628
E-mail: ole at cisco.com  URL: http://www.cisco.com/ipj
Skype: organdemo

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list