[rfc-i] verifying where we do/don't have consensus

Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor) rse at rfc-editor.org
Thu May 31 08:57:29 PDT 2012

On 5/31/12 8:52 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> By "consensus", do you mean "unanimous agreement"? I see a number of issues on your list marked as "no consensus" where there was broad agreement with one or two people loudly and repeatedly disagreeing.

No, I don't mean unanimous agreement.  But if there is something marked
"no consensus" and you (or anyone else) thinks that's not correct, then
please by all means correct me!  It means I've missed something on the list.

> You being clear what "consensus" means to you would be very helpful to us moving forwards.

Rough consensus, IETF-style.


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list