[rfc-i] Substantial revision

Joe Touch touch at isi.edu
Tue May 29 09:43:33 PDT 2012

On 5/28/2012 10:16 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2012-05-28 19:09, Joe Touch wrote:
>>> It seems obvious that system must allow for substantial revision
>>> by people other than the original authors.
>> The 'system' does just like for research pubs - write the new doc from
>> material from any output format. Source isn't needed got that at all.
> It's not needed. It's just immensely convenient if you want to make sure
> that you don't change more than you intended to change. (Think change
> control).

Change control can be useful for IDs (using the author's source, which 
might support revision), but very few RFCs are ever "bis'd", and benefit 
from a clean-slate revision more than mere incremental editing. I.e., 
revision support may be useful for author source, but isn't relevant for 
either the submission or output formats.


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list