[rfc-i] Pagination requirements

Joe Touch touch at isi.edu
Thu May 24 11:08:27 PDT 2012

On 5/24/2012 11:04 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> If we are able to move to a model in which multiple output formats can
> be produced, then we can vastly improve the experience for those who
> aren't attached to printed words on "the paper device", while not
> degrading the print experience since one of the output formats would be
> exactly what we produce today (or some reasonable facsimile).


I think this whole thread went off the rails by claiming that the 
canonical format would need to satisfy the output requirements.

If that's off the table (and I hope it is), maybe we can make progress.


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list