[rfc-i] Pagination requirements

Joe Touch touch at isi.edu
Thu May 24 10:54:34 PDT 2012

On 5/24/2012 10:49 AM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> On 24 May 2012, at 19:43 , Joe Touch wrote:
>>> "Refloweable" is also essential
>>> when you want to be able non-monospaced fonts.
>> Only if you care about full text justification. Otherwise, variable-width fonts display .txt just fine
> I would find it easier to take your real concerns seriously if you didn't multiplex them with such ridiculousness.

I'm confused - someone else claimed that reflow is essential to using 
variable-width fonts.

I'm demonstrating it's not true except for trivial aesthetics.

What [part is ridiculous about my response?


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list