[rfc-i] feedback on draft-hoffman-rfcformat-canon-others-00, was: RFC Format - final requirements and next steps

Julian Reschke julian.reschke at gmx.de
Thu May 17 13:11:48 PDT 2012

On 2012-05-17 22:04, Joe Touch wrote:
> On 5/17/2012 12:28 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> ...
>>> We probably also need to define what we expect happens to invalid
>>> sequences and "Private Use" sequences, or to prohibit their use as well.
>> No, we don't need to discuss invalid documents. Just don't produce them.
>> They are invalid.
> Private Use codes aren't invalid.

Come on.

They are "private use". Why would we want them inside a spec?

Best regards, Julian

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list