[rfc-i] RFC Format - final requirements and next steps

Phillip Hallam-Baker hallam at gmail.com
Wed May 16 21:14:30 PDT 2012

Page numbers met a certain need in dead tree technology. They don't
meet that need at all well for modern technology.

When I create cross references within a document they are always to a
particular section. It is very rare that section numbers offer less
granularity than page numbers in any case.

So when is a section number going to be worse?

On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:07 AM, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi at gmx.net> wrote:
> * Martin Rex wrote:
>>Page numbers are extremely useful!
> I remember being confused about this the very first time we were to read
> some book for school and ... were supposed to buy one particular edition
> of it, even if we had the book already, just so the page numbers match.
> Then I learned that books that are often used in school are regularily
> updated in ways that slightly change the page numbers. Found that funny.
> --
> Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern at hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
> Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
> 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
> _______________________________________________
> rfc-interest mailing list
> rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

Website: http://hallambaker.com/

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list