[rfc-i] Speaking of presenting RFCs

"Martin J. Dürst" duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp
Wed May 16 18:08:43 PDT 2012

On 2012/05/17 4:33, Tim Bray wrote:
> Check out http://pretty-rfc.herokuapp.com
> for example http://pretty-rfc.herokuapp.com/RFC3986
> Works great on my mobile; even shifts the ToC in and out depending
> whether the phone is in landscape or portrait. A fine piece of work.

Yes indeed. I have a few nits (see below), but it's definitely quite a 
bit better than the red-heavy stuff that one gets from xml2rfc by default.

Regards,    Martin.

Nits, so far:

- Authors shouldn't be numbered.
- Even if we'd prefer not to, I guess we need the copyright/... legal
   stuff :-(
- Lots of useful metainformation is missing (updates/obsoletes, date of 
- For references, the [] are dropped. Sometimes, that may look more 
natural, but in most cases, it results in arbitrary stuff in the middle 
of sentences. It probably also means that it kills some usages of grep 
on extracted text.
- The toc (on the right side) only goes to subsections, does not include 
- Some explanatory text around figures is indented too much (see 
http://pretty-rfc.herokuapp.com/RFC3986#query for an example). This is 
taken from <preamble> and <postamble>, but because these aren't very 
visibly distinct in the current standard rendering, authors often don't 
distinguish these and plain paragraphs very well.

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list