[rfc-i] Multiple HTML formats, was: RFC Format - final requirements and next steps

Iljitsch van Beijnum iljitsch at muada.com
Sun May 13 06:24:02 PDT 2012

On 12 May 2012, at 20:11 , Paul Hoffman wrote:

> why this will be good for people who want to have HTML versions of RFCs, namely that we can have multiple HTML formats to meet different needs.

Can you explain?

I would consider it a flaw in the HTML format if additional HTML formats are desired. HTML is extremely flexible, and can be made to anything we could reasonably want through the application of CSS. Or am I overlooking something?

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list