[rfc-i] Relation to other RFCs - Updates

Iljitsch van Beijnum iljitsch at muada.com
Thu May 3 16:24:29 PDT 2012

On 4 May 2012, at 0:48 , Martin Rex wrote:

> Yes, there are two distinct usages of the term "obsoletes":

If we require people to read another RFC just to learn the meaning of the third word in an RFC then we've already failed.

Like I said before, overloading the meaning of a single word is a bad idea, there should be text describing what's going on in enough detail somewhere in the document.

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list