[rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?

Iljitsch van Beijnum iljitsch at muada.com
Wed Jul 11 09:34:32 PDT 2012

On 10 Jul 2012, at 17:32 , Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:

> At this point I would like us to get to closure on the basic idea of
> moving to an XML based workflow with (unspecified) attachments within
> the RFC editor's domain first because that is something I think we are
> almost all agreed on.

I guess that happens when I don't read my mail for a few days. Please put me down for a big -1 on that XML thing.

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list