[rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?

Julian Reschke julian.reschke at gmx.de
Fri Jul 6 23:27:59 PDT 2012

On 2012-07-06 23:36, Joe Touch wrote:
> ...
>> The point I was trying to make is that just because "constrained HTML"
>> is HTML that doesn't mean that you can use an off-the-shelf HTML editor,
>> without further processing. At which point the difference to xml2rfc
>> isn't that big anymore.
> It is - xml-based requires an XML editor, or editing source. At least a
> few of us would like to be able to use a modern editor without editing
> source - even if it requires a post-processing step for submission.
> ...

Not true. Once you do need an additional processing step, you can have 
that step xml2rfc source as well.

Best regards, Julian

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list