[rfc-i] Does the canonical RFC format need to be "readable" by developers and others?

Joe Touch touch at isi.edu
Fri Jul 6 15:52:44 PDT 2012

On 7/6/2012 3:37 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> On Jul 6, 2012, at 3:33 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
>> As a practical matter, I think having a conversion from the XML to
>> HTML that does not discard information will prove very useful.
> +1. Fortunately, that is trivial both to do and to test.

I would be surprised; HTML seems to contain less info than XML (in a 
useful way).

That's why structured HTML seems like a better way forward; it is less 
restrictive on the author generation path.


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list