[rfc-i] last call "On Authors, Contributors, Editors, and overload."

Paul Hoffman paul.hoffman at vpnc.org
Tue Jan 10 12:00:21 PST 2012

On Jan 10, 2012, at 11:39 AM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 09:49:13AM -0800, Dave CROCKER wrote:
>> There should be some compelling functional benefit in the change,
>> and I continue not to see what this one will have.
> Chairs could stop arguing with people about who gets to be listed as
> "author" on WG documents?  This seems like a benefit to me.

Fully agree. It will reduce an administrative burden on a group that should be focusing on improving protocols, not justifying procedures that they don't even know who wrote.

--Paul Hoffman

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list