[rfc-i] Character sets, was Comments on draft-iab-rfcformat

Phillip Hallam-Baker hallam at gmail.com
Fri Dec 21 06:28:44 PST 2012

Well maybe[*] if you want to contribute to a technology research community
you should have acquired a certain minimum level of technology yourself.

[*] Note that is not a question, it is a statement of fact. As with the
phrase 'With all due respect" which actually means 'I am about to insult
you', the phrase "Well maybe" is used to indicate that what is being
presented as a suggestion is actually something that is rather obviously
true but the speaker does not think you will grasp.

On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 6:49 AM, Martin Rex <mrex at sap.com> wrote:

> "Martin J. Dürst" wrote:
> [ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
> > On 2012/12/20 9:13, Martin Rex wrote:
> >
> > > Not being able to discuss normative text on an IETF mailing list
> > > because it can not be represented in a plain-ASCII EMail would be
> > > just as bad as not being able to display an RFC through a
> > > plain SSH tty-based dialin, or discussed in f2f meetings.
> >
> > IETF mailing lists are perfectly able to handle to handle UTF-8 (or many
> > other non-ASCII encodings). The non-ASCII examples that Philipp was
> > sending out yesterday arrived here in good shape.
> Such garbage comes up as sequences of question marks on my MUA.
> -Martin

Website: http://hallambaker.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/attachments/20121221/501513af/attachment.htm>

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list