[rfc-i] Character sets, was Comments on draft-iab-rfcformat

Julian Reschke julian.reschke at gmx.de
Wed Dec 19 23:48:08 PST 2012

On 2012-12-20 01:54, Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor) wrote:
> ...
> I am also curious as to why more individuals have not chosen this
> option, but I don't think there is enough information to assign a
> conclusion.  My own perception is that it could be people just don't
> realize that option, OR they feel it's more of a hoop than they want
> to jump through given all the other things they've done to get the I-D
> to an RFC publication, OR there is not a need.
> ...

...or that the alternate format doesn't provide sufficient benefits. 
Allowing HTML as alternate format probably change things a lot.

Best regards, Julian

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list