[rfc-i] RFC editing tools

Ted Lemon mellon at fugue.com
Tue Dec 11 10:38:10 PST 2012

On Dec 11, 2012, at 1:27 PM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman at vpnc.org> wrote:
> The RFC Editor should do this by funding software development. If they do not, then things get ugly quickly.

A tool to convert between two canonical formats is a waste of effort.   We should have just one canonical format.   I happen to prefer XML, for reasons I've stated, but I would rather we settled on HTML than that we decided not to choose.

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list