[rfc-i] Illustrations, graphics, and normative-ness

Iljitsch van Beijnum iljitsch at muada.com
Thu Apr 26 10:18:30 PDT 2012

On 26 Apr 2012, at 17:05 , Paul Hoffman wrote:

>   Initiator                         Responder
>   -------------------------------------------------------------------
>   HDR, SAi1, KEi, Ni  -->
> . . .
>                                <--  HDR, SAr1, KEr, Nr, [CERTREQ]

> I consider that illustration to be normative. If I update the document in the future when there is a non-text graphics format so that this appears with solid lines and arrows, I would expect graphic to be normative.

> Do others agree? Disagree?

We currently have an illustration (to use the term loosely) that anyone with ASCII capability can decipher. If we allow for normative illustrations in one or more image formats without a mandatory ASCII version then we are moving up the system requirements for implementing an RFC significantly. And don't forget: not only the technical system requirements, but also the human system requirements.

I don't think that's a good idea.

But there are many avenues to explore for less normative better looking graphics. See some of my earlier messages.

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list