[rfc-i] support for tables (from RFC 5892)

Iljitsch van Beijnum iljitsch at muada.com
Tue Apr 24 15:19:57 PDT 2012

On 25 Apr 2012, at 0:13 , Larry Masinter wrote:

> This is also a good example of "Better support for tables". While XML2RFC supports tables, the ASCII output is hard to read.
> Should authors be allowed or discouraged from styling tables? (Separating lines, alignment, etc.)?

Tables typically don't degrade very gracefully so I'm not a huge fan. Lists are better in this regard. But sometimes a table is just what the doctor ordered.

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list