[rfc-i] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-iab-ise-model-00.txt
sm at resistor.net
Tue Sep 27 01:39:36 PDT 2011
At 13:51 26-09-2011, Nevil Brownlee wrote:
>To minimise confusion about the Independent Submissions Editor
>role, the IAB suggested that ISE material should be separated
>out from the RSE model, aka 520bis. I've published the draft
The title of the document is "Independent Submission Editor
Model". You could remove the word "model" as the Editorial Board is
out of scope.
In Section 2.1:
"An ability to define and constitute advisory and document review
arrangements. If those arrangements include an Editorial Board
similar to the current one or some equivalent arrangement, assess
the technical competence of potential Editorial Board members."
Which Board is that? Do you want a forward reference to Section 3?
In Section 3:
"This volunteer Editorial Board exists at the pleasure of the ISE, and
the members serve at the pleasure of the ISE."
There is some redundancy in the above sentence.
I vaguely recall that the financial aspect was discussed
previously. Was the outcome to have a line item for the ISE under
the IAB budget? Section 4.2 of draft-iab-rfc-editor-model-v2-02 has
it listed under RFC Editor. BTW, I am not arguing for a change.
More information about the rfc-interest