[rfc-i] rfc-interest Digest, Vol 81, Issue 10

John C Klensin john+rfc at jck.com
Sun Jul 10 17:34:01 PDT 2011

--On Sunday, July 10, 2011 16:58:49 -0700, Bernard Aboba
<bernard.aboba at gmail.com> wrote...

> [BA] I don't believe that the intent is for the  RSOC to have
> "responsibility" to the IAOC.
> The RSOC's responsibility is to the IAB.

That is how I've understood it.  I think Brian (and perhaps some
others) are looking for a different model.

> [BA] Under RFC 2850, the IAB is responsible for the RFC
> Editor, and since the document does not update RFC 2850, that
> responsibility remains.   The "RFC Editor Program" consists of
> one or more IAB members (the internal group) that are
> responsible for "actively watching" the situation on behalf of
> the IAB, as well as the non-IAB RSOC members. 

Again, that is certainly consistent with my understanding

> The document could perhaps do a better job of making this
> clear.

Yes, that was part of my point.


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list