[rfc-i] RSE and RAOC: IAB state, developing consensus, and strawman.

Olaf Kolkman olaf at NLnetLabs.nl
Tue Jan 25 05:52:21 PST 2011

>> The first assignment, documented in the SOW, is to develop a vision
>> for the RFC series that takes into account that:
> Sadly, I don't think this works.  We've had repeated comments that
> hiring people
> without clear lines of authority and accountability results in
> frustration, and this amounts
> to hiring someone without clear accountability.  It is a very tempting
> idea, but the way it is described sounds like a series of steps:
> 1) Develop connection to community (6-9 months)
> 2) Develop vision of what job entails (order of months?)
> 3) Do job.

Aha... I see what you read. Again this proves that communication is difficult.

With 'first assignment' I was more thinking in terms of importance than in terms of completion along a time line.

I think we can agree that one of the most important deliverables at the end of the (few year) term are the items i mentioned, correct?



Olaf M. Kolkman                        NLnet Labs
                                       Science Park 140, 
http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/               1098 XG Amsterdam

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2210 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/attachments/20110125/373d5684/attachment.p7s>

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list