[rfc-i] Classifying pre-IETF RFCs

Bob Hinden bob.hinden at gmail.com
Tue Nov 30 11:00:47 PST 2010

My view is that we have better things to do than to try to classify early RFCs based on a classification scheme that was developed long after they were written.   This classification scheme is likely to change in the future and we would then get to repeat the exercise.


On Nov 30, 2010, at 8:19 AM, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote:

> Hello all,
> Some notes about pre-IETF RFCs classifying.
> Now I agree that early RFCs does not need modern
> classification. However I think it would be acceptable
> if we mark them in accordance with RFC1000 (but
> if they have RFC2026 category, they will remain it
> while getting the RFC1000 status).
> What do you think about this?
> Mykyta Yevstifeyev
> P. S. My old drafts are requested to be marked as
> 'withdrawn'. Mykyta.
> _______________________________________________
> rfc-interest mailing list
> rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list