[rfc-i] My comments on http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-kowack-rfc-editor-model-v2-00.txt

Joel M. Halpern jmh at joelhalpern.com
Mon Nov 15 12:07:40 PST 2010

(Eliding a number of interesting points that require cogitation...)

With regard to the point below, remember that the TRSE was specifically 
charged to make a recommendation.  He is, as one would hope, putting 
that recommendation in the form of an I-D, and discussing it with the 
community.  Given that he is charged with making the recommendation, I 
do not see how anyone else can own that document.  (Also, since what is 
called for is his recommendation, it will then be up to the IAB to 
decide how that recommendation fits with what the IAB understands to be 
the needs and wants of the community.)


On 11/15/2010 11:54 AM, Leslie Daigle wrote:
> 3/ It is not clear to me that the TRSE has to be the editor of that
> discussion document:  expertise in writing a discussion document is
> what's needed here, and the TRSE expertise is _input_ to that document.

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list