[rfc-i] insufficient engagement on draft-iab-rfc-editor-model-00

Dave CROCKER dhc2 at dcrocker.net
Tue Oct 21 11:02:20 PDT 2008

Bob Braden wrote:
> Straightforward, maybe, but not painless for the contractor, and therefore, 
> not painless for the quality of RFC publication service you can expect.

Since the contractor has been operating in their current role for a very, very 
long time, and much of that time has had formal arrangements that were far more 
tentative, why is a two-year contract renewal a problem at this particular time?

More substantive resolution would of course be better, but how is an extension a 
serious problem?



   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list