[rfc-i] citing historic internet drafts

Keith Moore moore at cs.utk.edu
Thu Oct 16 13:21:12 PDT 2008

Does anyone else have the impression that we're too attached to the
three words "work in progress" to describe Internet Drafts, and that it
should be acceptable to use other, appropriately descriptive, language
when citing a draft for non-normative purposes?


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list