[rfc-i] RFC Editor Queue Contents

Geoff Huston gih at apnic.net
Thu Jan 13 12:44:09 PST 2005

Thanks for this clarification



At 04:34 AM 14/01/2005, RFC Editor wrote:
>The entry for RFC 3668 refers to the republication of RFC 3668.  The
>IESG sent us a notice to republish this document with a slight
>modification, but there was no ID issued.  Our way of entering this
>document in our queue was to enter it as RFC3668bis.
>RFC 3302 is listed in our queue to reflect our need to move this
>document to a draft standard.  However, we cannot do this until
><draft-ietf-fax-tiff-fx-14.txt> and
><draft-ietf-fax-tiff-fx-reg-v2-01.txt> have been published.  The RFC
>3302 entry was listed so users would know we did not forget about
>this action.
>Please let us know if this is unclear or if you believe there are
>changes necessary.
>Thank you.
>RFC Editor
>On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 03:53:12PM +1100, Geoff Huston wrote:
> > On a matter related to queued drafts I was looking through the RFC Editor
> > Queue (http://www.rfc-editor.org/queue.html) and I noticed queue entries
> > for RFC 3668 (in AUTH state, evidently),  RFC 3302 (in REF state)
> >
> > Are these genuine RFC Editor queue entries? What work needs to be done to
> > these documents post RFC publication?
> >
> > regards,
> >
> >    Geoff
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rfc-interest mailing list
> > rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org
> > http://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list