[rfc-i] Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-hoffman-rfc-author-guide-00.txt

scott bradner sob at harvard.edu
Wed Sep 8 05:42:17 PDT 2004

> That's fine, and I agree with this goal. It's just that I think that it 
> could be achieved more effectively if edits on the *content* (language, 
> spelling and so on) are done on the author's *source* document, and 
> other changes (whitespace, indentation, ...) only occur when the actual 
> content is fixed. Doing both at the same time makes it needlessly hard 
> to track unintended changes.

I've not found this to be a problem using wdiff or the RFC Editor's 
diff page (both of which ignore whitespace changes)


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list