[rfc-i] UTF-8 and Unicode examples

Alex Rousskov rousskov at measurement-factory.com
Tue May 4 12:56:50 PDT 2004

On Tue, 4 May 2004, Julian Reschke wrote:

> Alex Rousskov wrote:
> > ...
> >>People frequently only check the HTML output, but in the end what
> >>matters is readable TXT output.
> >
> >
> > In my experience, we have already crossed the line where readable HTML
> > output implies readable TXT output with xml2rfc. YMMV.
> Yes, it does *now*. But the more features we put into xml2rfc that do
> not directly translate to TXT, the less you can rely on that.

What I meant is that in my experience, HTML output quality already
does NOT imply comparable TXT output quality. Great HTML-looking RFCs
already often do not look good in TXT. The genie of output "interface"
quality is out of the bottle as far as xml2rfc is concerned.


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list