RFC 8847: Protocol for Controlling Multiple Streams for Telepresence (CLUE)
- R. Presta,
- S P. Romano
Abstract
The Controlling Multiple Streams for Telepresence (CLUE) protocol is an application protocol conceived for the description and negotiation of a telepresence session. The design of the CLUE protocol takes into account the requirements and the framework defined within the IETF CLUE Working Group. A companion document, RFC 8848, delves into CLUE signaling details as well as the SIP / Session Description Protocol (SDP) session establishment phase. CLUE messages flow over the CLUE data channel, based on reliable and ordered SCTP-over-DTLS transport. ("SCTP" stands for "Stream Control Transmission Protocol".) Message details, together with the behavior of CLUE Participants acting as Media Providers and/or Media Consumers, are herein discussed.¶
Status of This Memo
This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is published for examination, experimental implementation, and evaluation.¶
This document defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community. This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has received public review and has been approved for publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Not all documents approved by the IESG are candidates for any level of Internet Standard; see Section 2 of RFC 7841.¶
Information about the current status of this document, any
errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
https://
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2021 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.¶
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(https://
1. Introduction
The Controlling Multiple Streams for Telepresence (CLUE) protocol is an application protocol used by two CLUE Participants to enhance the experience of a multimedia telepresence session. The main goals of the CLUE protocol are as follows:¶
CLUE-capable endpoints are connected by means of the CLUE data channel -- an SCTP-over-DTLS channel that is opened and established as described in [RFC8848] and [RFC8850]. ("SCTP" stands for "Stream Control Transmission Protocol".) CLUE protocol messages flowing over such a channel are detailed in this document, both syntactically and semantically.¶
In Section 4, we provide a general overview of the
CLUE protocol.
CLUE protocol messages are detailed in Section 5.
The CLUE protocol state machines are introduced in
Section 6.
Versioning and extensions are discussed
in Sections 7 and 8,
respectively. The XML schema [W3C
2. Terminology
This document refers to terminology that is also used in [RFC8845] and [RFC7262]. For convenience, we list those terms below. The definition of "CLUE Participant", as also listed below, originates from this document.¶
- Capture Encoding:
- A specific encoding of a Media Capture, to be sent via RTP [RFC3550].¶
- CLUE Participant (CP):
- An entity able to use the CLUE protocol within a telepresence session. It can be an endpoint or an MCU (Multipoint Control Unit) able to use the CLUE protocol.¶
- CLUE-capable device:
- A device that (1) supports the CLUE data channel [RFC8850], the CLUE protocol, and the principles of CLUE negotiation and (2) seeks CLUE-enabled calls.¶
- Endpoint:
- A CLUE-capable device that is the logical point
of final termination through receiving, decoding, and rendering, and/or
initiation through the capturing, encoding, and sending of media
streams. An endpoint consists of one or more physical devices
that source and sink media streams, and exactly one
participant (as described in [RFC4353])
that, in turn, includes exactly one user agent [RFC3261]. Endpoints can be anything from multiscreen
/multicamera rooms to handheld devices.¶ - Multipoint Control Unit (MCU):
- A CLUE-capable device that connects two or more endpoints together into one single multimedia conference [RFC7667]. An MCU includes a mixer (as defined in [RFC4353]), without the requirement per [RFC4353] to send media to each participant.¶
- Media:
- Any data that, after suitable encoding, can be conveyed over RTP, including audio, video, or timed text.¶
- Media Capture:
- A source of media -- for example, from one or more Capture Devices or constructed from other Media streams.¶
- Media Consumer (MC):
- A CP (i.e., an Endpoint or an MCU) able to receive Capture Encodings.¶
- Media Provider (MP):
- A CP (i.e., an Endpoint or an MCU) able to send Capture Encodings.¶
- Stream:
- A Capture Encoding sent from an MP to an MC via RTP [RFC3550].¶
3. Conventions
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.¶
4. Overview of the CLUE Protocol
The CLUE protocol is conceived to enable CLUE telepresence sessions. It is designed to address Session Description Protocol (SDP) limitations in terms of the description of some information about the multimedia streams that are involved in a real-time multimedia conference. Indeed, by simply using SDP, it is not possible to convey information about the features of the flowing multimedia streams that are needed to enable a "being there" rendering experience. Such information is contained in the CLUE framework document [RFC8845] and formally defined and described in the CLUE data model document [RFC8846]. The CLUE protocol represents the mechanism for the exchange of telepresence information between CPs. It mainly provides the messages to enable an MP to advertise its telepresence capabilities and to enable an MC to select the desired telepresence options.¶
The CLUE protocol, as defined in this document and further described below, is a stateful client-server XML-based application protocol. CLUE protocol messages flow on a reliable and ordered SCTP-over-DTLS transport channel connecting two CPs. Messages carry information taken from the XML-based CLUE data model [RFC8846]. Three main communication phases can be identified:¶
- Establishment of the CLUE data channel:
- In this phase, the CLUE data channel setup takes place. If it completes successfully, the CPs are able to communicate and start the initiation phase.¶
- Negotiation of the CLUE protocol version and extensions (initiation phase):
- The CPs connected via the CLUE data channel agree on the protocol version and extensions to be used during the telepresence session. Special CLUE
messages are used for such a task ('options' and 'options
Response' ). The negotiation of the version and extensions can be performed once during the CLUE session and only at this stage. At the end of that basic negotiation, each CP starts its activity as a CLUE MP and/or CLUE MC.¶ - Description and negotiation of CLUE telepresence capabilities:
- In this phase, the MP-MC dialogues take place on the data channel by means of the CLUE protocol messages.¶
As soon as the channel is ready, the CPs must agree on the
protocol version and extensions to be used within the telepresence session.
CLUE protocol version numbers are characterized by a major version
number and a minor version number, both unsigned integers, separated by a dot.
While minor version numbers denote backward
After the negotiation phase is completed, CPs describe and agree on the media flows to be exchanged. In many cases, CPs will seek to both transmit and receive media. Hence, in a call between two CPs (e.g., CPs A and B), there would be two separate message exchange sequences, as follows:¶
CLUE messages for the media session description and negotiation are designed by considering the MP side to be the server side of the protocol, since it produces and provides media streams, and the MC side as the client side of the protocol, since it requests and receives media streams. The messages that are exchanged to set up the telepresence media session are described by focusing on a single MP-MC dialogue.¶
The MP first advertises its available media captures and encoding capabilities to the MC, as well as its simultaneity constraints, according to the information model defined in [RFC8845]. The CLUE message conveying the MP's multimedia offer is the 'advertisement' message. Such a message leverages the XML data model definitions provided in [RFC8846].¶
The MC selects the desired streams of the MP by using the 'configure'
message, which makes reference to the information carried in the
previously received 'advertisement'
Besides 'advertisement' and 'configure', other messages have been conceived in order to provide all needed mechanisms and operations. Such messages are detailed in the following sections.¶
5. Protocol Messages
CLUE protocol messages are textual XML-based messages that enable the configuration of the telepresence session. The formal definition of such messages is provided in the XML schema in Section 9. This section includes non-normative excerpts of the schema to aid in describing it.¶
The XML definitions of the CLUE information provided in [RFC8846] are included within some CLUE protocol messages (namely the 'advertisement' and 'configure' messages), in order to use the concepts defined in [RFC8845].¶
The CLUE protocol messages are as follows:¶
While the 'options' and 'options
Each CLUE message inherits a basic structure, as depicted in the following excerpt (Figure 1):¶
The information contained in each CLUE message is as follows:¶
- clueId:
- An optional XML element containing the identifier (in the form of a generic string) of the CP within the telepresence system.¶
- sequenceNr:
- An XML element containing the local message sequence number. The sender MUST increment the sequence number by one for each new message sent, and the receiver MUST remember the most recent sequence number received and send back a 402 error if it receives a message with an unexpected sequence number (e.g., sequence number gap, repeated sequence number, sequence number too small). The initial sequence number can be chosen randomly by each party.¶
- protocol:
- A mandatory attribute set to "CLUE", identifying the protocol the messages refer to.¶
- v:
- A mandatory attribute carrying the version of the protocol. The content of the "v" attribute is composed of the major version number followed by a dot and then by the minor version number of the CLUE protocol in use. The major number cannot be "0", and if it is more than one digit, it cannot start with a "0". Allowed values of this kind are "1.3", "2.0", "20.44", etc. This document describes version 1.0.¶
Each CP is responsible for creating and updating up to three independent streams of sequence numbers in messages it sends: (i) one for the messages sent in the initiation phase, (ii) one for the messages sent as an MP (if it is acting as an MP), and (iii) one for the messages sent as an MC (if it is acting as an MC).¶
In particular, CLUE response messages
The elements <responseCode> and <reasonString> are populated as detailed in Section 5.7.¶
5.1. 'options'
The 'options' message is sent by the CP that is the CI to the CP that is the CR as soon as the CLUE data channel is ready. Besides the information envisioned in the basic structure, it specifies:¶
- <mediaProvider>:
- A mandatory boolean field set to "true" if the CP is able to act as an MP.¶
- <mediaConsumer>:
- A mandatory boolean field set to "true" if the CP is able to act as an MC.¶
- <supported
Versions> : - The list of supported versions.¶
- <supported
Extensions> : - The list of supported extensions.¶
The XML schema of such a message is shown below (Figure 3):¶
<supported
The <supported
5.2. 'optionsResponse'
The 'options
Upon reception of the 'options
5.3. 'advertisement'
The 'advertisement' message is used by each MP to advertise the
available media captures and related information to the corresponding MC.
The MP sends an 'advertisement' to the MC as soon as it is ready after the
successful completion of the initiation phase, i.e., as soon as the
CPs have agreed on the version and extensions of the CLUE protocol.
During a single CLUE session, an MP may send new 'advertisement' messages to replace
the previous advertisement if, for instance, its CLUE
telepresence media capabilities change mid‑call. A new 'advertisement' completely
replaces the previous 'advertisement'
The 'advertisement' structure is defined in the schema excerpt below (Figure 5). The 'advertisement' contains elements compliant with the CLUE data model that characterize the MP's telepresence offer. Namely, such elements are the list of¶
Each of them is fully described in the CLUE framework document [RFC8845] and formally defined in the CLUE data model document [RFC8846].¶
5.4. 'ack'
The 'ack' message
is sent by an MC to an MP to acknowledge an 'advertisement' message.
As can be seen from the message schema provided in the following
excerpt (Figure 6),
the 'ack' contains a response code and may contain a reason string
for describing the processing result of the 'advertisement'
5.5. 'configure'
The 'configure' message is sent from an MC to an MP
to list the advertised captures the MC wants to receive.
The MC MUST send a 'configure' after the reception of an 'advertisement'
The <advSequenceNr> element contains the sequence number of the 'advertisement' message the 'configure' refers to.¶
The optional <ack> element, when present, contains a success
response code, as defined in Section 5.7.
It indicates that the 'configure' message also acknowledges
with success the referred advertisement
The most important content of the 'configure' message is the list of
capture encodings provided in the <capture
5.6. 'configureResponse'
The 'configure
5.7. Response Codes and Reason Strings
Response codes are defined as a sequence of three digits. A well-defined meaning is associated with the first digit. Response codes beginning with "2" are associated with successful responses. Response codes that do not begin with either "2" or "1" indicate an error response, i.e., that an error occurred while processing a CLUE request. In particular, response codes beginning with "3" indicate problems with the XML content of the message ("Bad syntax", "Invalid value", etc.), while response codes beginning with "4" refer to problems related to CLUE protocol semantics ("Invalid sequencing", "Version not supported", etc.). 200, 300, and 400 codes are the most generic codes in their respective categories. Further response codes can be defined either in future versions of the protocol or by leveraging the extension mechanism. In both cases, the new response codes MUST be registered with IANA. Such new response codes MUST NOT override the codes defined in this document, and they MUST respect the semantics of the first code digit.¶
This document does not define response codes starting with "1", and such response codes are not allowed to appear in major version 1 of the CLUE protocol. The range from 100 to 199 inclusive is reserved for future major versions of the protocol to define response codes for delayed or incomplete operations, if necessary. Response codes starting with "5" through "9" are reserved for future major versions of the protocol to define new classes of responses and are not allowed in major version 1 of the CLUE protocol. Response codes starting with "0" are not allowed.¶
The response codes and reason strings defined for use with version 1 of the CLUE protocol are listed in Table 1. The "Description" text contained in the table can be sent in the <reasonString> element of a response message. Implementations can (and are encouraged to) include descriptions of the error condition that are more specific, if possible.¶
6. Protocol State Machines
The CLUE protocol is an application protocol used between two CPs in order to properly configure a multimedia telepresence session. CLUE protocol messages flow over the CLUE data channel, an SCTP-over-DTLS channel established as depicted in [RFC8850]. We herein discuss the state machines associated with the CP (Figure 9), the MP role (Figure 10 in Section 6.1), and the MC role (Figure 11 in Section 6.2), respectively. Endpoints often wish to both send and receive media, i.e., act as both an MP and an MC. As such, there will often be two sets of messages flowing in opposite directions; the state machines of these two flows do not interact with each other. Only the CLUE application logic is considered. The interaction of CLUE protocol and SDP negotiations for the media streams exchanged is discussed in [RFC8848].¶
The main state machines focus on the behavior of the CP acting as a CLUE CI/CR.¶
The initial state is the IDLE state. When in the IDLE state, the CLUE data channel is not established and no CLUE-controlled media are exchanged between the two CLUE-capable devices in question (if there is an ongoing exchange of media streams, such media streams are not currently CLUE controlled).¶
When the CLUE data channel is set up ("start channel"), the CP moves from the IDLE state to the CHANNEL SETUP state.¶
If the CLUE data channel is successfully set up ("channel established"), the CP moves from the CHANNEL SETUP state to the OPTIONS state. Otherwise, if a "channel error" occurs, it moves back to the IDLE state. The same transition happens if the CLUE-enabled telepresence session ends ("session ends"), i.e., when an SDP negotiation for removing the CLUE data channel is performed.¶
When in the OPTIONS state, the CP addresses the initiation phase where
both parts agree on the version and extensions to be used in the
subsequent CLUE message exchange phase.
If the CP is the CI, it sends an 'options' message and
waits for the 'options
When in the ACTIVE state, the CP starts the envisioned sub-state
machines (i.e., the MP state machine and the MC state machine)
according to the roles it plays in the telepresence sessions.
Such roles have been previously declared in the 'options' and
'options
6.1. Media Provider's State Machine
As soon as the sub-state machine of the MP (Figure 10) is activated, it is in the ADV state. In the ADV state, the MP prepares the 'advertisement' message reflecting its actual telepresence capabilities.¶
After the 'advertisement' has been sent ("advertisement sent"),
the MP moves from the ADV state to the WAIT FOR ACK state. If an
'ack' message with a successful response code arrives
("ack received"), the MP moves to the WAIT FOR CONF state.
If a NACK arrives (i.e., an 'ack' message with an error response
code), the MP moves back to the ADV state for preparation of a new
'advertisement'
When in the WAIT FOR CONF state, the MP listens to the channel for a 'configure' request coming from the MC. When a 'configure' arrives ("configure received"), the MP switches to the CONF RESPONSE state. If the telepresence settings change in the meantime ("changed telepresence settings"), the MP moves from the WAIT FOR CONF state back to the ADV state to create the new 'advertisement' to be sent to the MC.¶
The MP in the CONF RESPONSE state processes the received 'configure'
in order to produce a 'configure
The MP in the ESTABLISHED state has successfully negotiated the media streams with the MC by means of the CLUE messages. If there are changes in the MP's telepresence settings ("changed telepresence settings"), the MP moves back to the ADV state. In the ESTABLISHED state, the CLUE-controlled media streams of the session are those described in the last successfully processed 'configure' message.¶
Messages not shown for a state do not cause the state to change.¶
6.2. Media Consumer's State Machine
As soon as the sub-state machine of the MC (Figure 11) is activated, it is in the WAIT FOR ADV state. An MC in the WAIT FOR ADV state is waiting for an 'advertisement' coming from the MP. If the 'advertisement' arrives ("ADV received"), the MC moves to the ADV PROCESSING state. Otherwise, the MC stays in the WAIT FOR ADV state.¶
In the ADV PROCESSING state, the 'advertisement' is parsed by the MC.
If the 'advertisement' is successfully processed, two scenarios are
possible. In the first case, the MC issues a successful 'ack'
message to the MP ("ack sent") and moves to the CONF state. This
typically happens when the MC needs some more time to produce the
'configure' message associated with the received 'advertisement'
If the processing of the 'advertisement' is unsuccessful (bad syntax, missing XML
elements, etc.), the MC sends a NACK message (i.e., an 'ack' with
an error response code) to the MP and, optionally, further describes
the problem via a proper reason phrase. In this scenario ("NACK sent"),
the MC switches back to the WAIT FOR ADV
state and waits for a new 'advertisement'
When in the CONF state, the MC prepares the 'configure' request to be
issued to the MP on the basis of the previously acked
'advertisement'
In the WAIT FOR CONF RESPONSE state, the MC waits for the MP's
response to the issued 'configure' or 'configure+ack'
When the MC is in the ESTABLISHED state, the telepresence session
configuration has been set up at the CLUE application level according
to the MC's preferences. Both the MP and the MC have agreed on (and
are aware of) the CLUE-controlled media streams to be exchanged
within the call. While in the ESTABLISHED state, the MC might
decide to change something in the call settings; in this case, the MC
then issues a new 'configure' ("configure sent") and moves to the
WAIT FOR CONF RESPONSE state to wait for the new 'configure
Messages not shown for a state do not cause the state to change.¶
7. Versioning
CLUE protocol messages are XML messages compliant to the CLUE protocol XML schema [RFC8846]. The version of the protocol corresponds to the version of the schema. Both the client and the server have to test the compliance of the received messages with the XML schema of the CLUE protocol. If the compliance is not verified, the message cannot be processed further.¶
The client and server cannot communicate if they do not share exactly
the same XML schema.
Such a schema is associated with the CLUE URN
"urn
This document defines version 1.0 of the CLUE protocol schema, using XML schema version 1.0 [W3C
The minor versions of the XML schema MUST be backward compatible, not only in terms of the schema but semantically and procedurally as well. This means that they should define further features and functionality besides those defined in the previous versions, in an incremental way, without impacting the basic rules defined in the previous version of the schema. In this way, if an MP is able to "speak", for example, version 1.5 of the protocol while the MC only understands version 1.4, the MP should have no problem in reverting the dialogue back to version 1.4 without exploiting 1.5 features and functionality. Version 1.4 is the one to be spoken and has to appear in the "v" attribute of the subsequent CLUE messages. In other words, in this example, the MP MUST use version 1.4. That said, and in keeping with the general IETF protocol "robustness principle" stating that an implementation must be conservative in its sending behavior and liberal in its receiving behavior [RFC1122], CPs MUST ignore unknown elements or attributes that are not envisioned in the negotiated protocol version and related extensions.¶
8. Extensions
Although the standard version of the CLUE protocol XML schema is designed to thoroughly cope with the requirements emerging from the application domain, new needs might arise, and new extensions can then be designed. Extensions specify information and behaviors that are not described in a certain version of the protocol and specified in the related RFC document. Such information and behaviors can be optionally used in a CLUE dialogue and MUST be negotiated in the CLUE initiation phase. They can relate to:¶
As to the first category of extensions, it is possible to distinguish between
protocol
When new protocol
The new information must be qualified by namespaces
other than "urn
The other matter concerns data model information.
Data model information is defined by the XML schema associated
with the URN "urn
On the other hand (the second category of extensions), "extra" CLUE protocol messages, i.e., messages not envisioned in the latest standard version of the schema, might be needed. In that case, the messages and the associated behavior should be defined in external documents that both communication parties must be aware of.¶
As shown in Figure 12, the fields of the <extension> element (either new information or new messages) take the following values:¶
The above-described <extension> element is carried within
the 'options' and 'options
Extensions MUST be defined in a separate XML schema file and MUST be provided with a companion document describing their semantics and use.¶
8.1. Extension Example
An example of an extension might be a "new" capture attribute (i.e., a capture attribute that is not envisioned in the current standard defining the CLUE data model in [RFC8846]) needed to further describe a video capture.¶
The CLUE data model document [RFC8846] envisions the possibility of adding this kind of "extra" information in the description of a video capture. For convenience, the XML definition of a video capture taken from [RFC8846] is shown in Figure 13 below.¶
According to such a definition, a video capture might have, after the set of generic media capture attributes, a set of new attributes defined elsewhere, i.e., in an XML schema defining an extension. The XML schema defining the extension might look like the following (Figure 14):¶
By using the extension above, a video capture can be further described
in the advertisement using the <my
9. XML Schema
The XML schema defining the CLUE messages is provided below (Figure 15).¶
10. Call Flow Example
This section describes the CLUE protocol messages exchanged in the following call flow. For simplicity, only one direction of media is shown, as the other direction is precisely symmetric.¶
Two CPs, CP1 and CP2, have successfully set up the CLUE channel according to [RFC8850]. CP1 is the CI, and CP2 is the CR.¶
After the initiation phase is completed, CP1 and CP2 start their activity as the MP and the MC, respectively. For the sake of simplicity, the rest of the call flow focuses only on the dialogue between MP CP1 and MC CP2.¶
We would also like to point out that in the depicted flow three distinct sequence number spaces per sender are involved (two of which appear in the snippets, since we only show one direction of media). The discontinuity between the sequence number values in Sections 10.2 and 10.3 is hence correct.¶
11. Security Considerations
As a general consideration, we would like to point out that the CLUE framework
(and related protocol)
has been conceived from the outset by embracing the security
The CLUE protocol is an application
The CLUE framework document [RFC8845] also mentions that the information carried within CLUE protocol messages might contain sensitive data, which SHOULD hence be accessed only by authenticated endpoints. Security issues associated with the CLUE data model schema are discussed in [RFC8846].¶
There is extra information carried by the CLUE protocol that is not
associated with the CLUE data model schema and that exposes
information that might be of concern. This information is primarily
exchanged during the negotiation phase via the 'options' and 'options
The CLUE framework clearly states the requirement to protect CLUE protocol messages against threats deriving from the presence of a malicious agent capable of gaining access to the CLUE data channel. Such a requirement is met by the CLUE data channel solution described in [RFC8850], which ensures protection from both message recovery and message tampering. With respect to this last point, any implementation of the CLUE protocol compliant with the CLUE specification MUST rely on the exchange of messages that flow on top of a reliable and ordered SCTP-over-DTLS transport channel connecting two CPs.¶
12. IANA Considerations
This document registers a new XML namespace, a new XML schema, and the media type for the schema. This document also registers the "CLUE" Application Service tag and the "CLUE" Application Protocol tag and defines registries for the CLUE messages and response codes.¶
12.1. URN Sub-Namespace Registration
This section registers a new XML namespace,
urn.¶
XML:¶
12.2. XML Schema Registration
This section registers an XML schema per the guidelines in [RFC3688].¶
12.3. Media Type Registration for "application/clue+xml"
This section registers the
application media type.¶
- To:
- ietf
-types @iana .org¶ - Subject:
- Registration of media type "application
/clue+xml"¶ - Media type name:
- application¶
- Subtype name:
- clue+xml¶
- Required parameters:
- (none)¶
- Optional parameters:
- charset. Same as the charset parameter of "application
/xml" as specified in [RFC7303], Section 4.2.¶ - Encoding considerations:
- Same as the encoding considerations of
"application
/xml" as specified in [RFC7303], Section 4.2.¶ - Security considerations:
- This content type is designed to carry protocol data related to telepresence session control. Some of the data could be considered private. This media type does not provide any protection; thus, other mechanisms, such as those described in Section 11 of this document, are required to protect the data. This media type does not contain executable content.¶
- Interoperability considerations:
- None.¶
- Published specification:
- RFC 8847¶
- Applications that use this media type:
- CLUE Participants.¶
- Additional Information:
-
- Person & email address to contact for further information:
- Simon Pietro Romano
(spromano @unina .it ).¶ - Intended usage:
- LIMITED USE¶
- Author/Change controller:
- The IETF¶
- Other information:
- This media type is a specialization of
application/xml [RFC7303], and many of the considerations
described there also apply to application
/clue+xml .¶
12.4. CLUE Protocol Registry
Per this document, IANA has created new registries for CLUE messages and response codes.¶
12.4.1. CLUE Message Types
The following summarizes the registry for CLUE messages:¶
- Related Registry:
- CLUE Message Types¶
- Defining RFC:
- RFC 8847¶
- Registration
/Assignment Procedures: - Following the policies outlined in [RFC8126], the IANA policy for assigning new values for the CLUE message types for the CLUE protocol is Specification Required.¶
- Registrant Contact:
- IESG
(iesg @ietf .org ).¶
The initial table of CLUE messages is populated using the CLUE messages described in Section 5 and defined in the XML schema in Section 9.¶
12.4.2. CLUE Response Codes
The following summarizes the registry for CLUE response codes:¶
- Related Registry:
- CLUE Response Codes¶
- Defining RFC:
- RFC 8847¶
- Registration
/Assignment Procedures: - Following the policies outlined in [RFC8126], the IANA policy for assigning new values for the response codes for CLUE is Specification Required.¶
- Registrant Contact:
- IESG
(iesg @ietf .org ).¶
The initial table of CLUE response codes is populated using the response codes defined in Section 5.7 as follows:¶
13. References
13.1. Normative References
- [RFC2119]
-
Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10
.17487 , , <https:///RFC2119 www >..rfc -editor .org /info /rfc2119 - [RFC3550]
-
Schulzrinne, H., Casner, S., Frederick, R., and V. Jacobson, "RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time Applications", STD 64, RFC 3550, DOI 10
.17487 , , <https:///RFC3550 www >..rfc -editor .org /info /rfc3550 - [RFC3688]
-
Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688, DOI 10
.17487 , , <https:///RFC3688 www >..rfc -editor .org /info /rfc3688 - [RFC7303]
-
Thompson, H. and C. Lilley, "XML Media Types", RFC 7303, DOI 10
.17487 , , <https:///RFC7303 www >..rfc -editor .org /info /rfc7303 - [RFC8126]
-
Cotton, M., Leiba, B., and T. Narten, "Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 8126, DOI 10
.17487 , , <https:///RFC8126 www >..rfc -editor .org /info /rfc8126 - [RFC8174]
-
Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10
.17487 , , <https:///RFC8174 www >..rfc -editor .org /info /rfc8174 - [RFC8845]
-
Duckworth, M., Ed., Pepperell, A., and S. Wenger, "Framework for Telepresence Multi-Streams", RFC 8845, DOI 10
.17487 , , <https:///RFC8845 www >..rfc -editor .org /info /rfc8845 - [RFC8846]
-
Presta, R. and S P. Romano, "An XML Schema for the Controlling Multiple Streams for Telepresence (CLUE) Data Model", RFC 8846, DOI 10
.17487 , , <https:///RFC8846 www >..rfc -editor .org /info /rfc8846 - [RFC8848]
-
Hanton, R., Kyzivat, P., Xiao, L., and C. Groves, "Session Signaling for Controlling Multiple Streams for Telepresence (CLUE)", RFC 8848, DOI 10
.17487 , , <https:///RFC8848 www >..rfc -editor .org /info /rfc8848 - [RFC8850]
-
Holmberg, C., "Controlling Multiple Streams for Telepresence (CLUE) Protocol Data Channel", RFC 8850, DOI 10
.17487 , , <https:///RFC8850 www >..rfc -editor .org /info /rfc8850 - [W3C
.REC -xml -20081126] -
Bray, T., Paoli, J., Sperberg
-Mc , Maler, E., and F. Yergeau, "Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Fifth Edition)", World Wide Web Consortium Recommendation RECQueen, M. -xml , , <https://-20081126 www >..w3 .org /TR /2008 /REC -xml -20081126
13.2. Informative References
- [RFC1122]
-
Braden, R., Ed., "Requirements for Internet Hosts - Communication Layers", STD 3, RFC 1122, DOI 10
.17487 , , <https:///RFC1122 www >..rfc -editor .org /info /rfc1122 - [RFC3261]
-
Rosenberg, J., Schulzrinne, H., Camarillo, G., Johnston, A., Peterson, J., Sparks, R., Handley, M., and E. Schooler, "SIP: Session Initiation Protocol", RFC 3261, DOI 10
.17487 , , <https:///RFC3261 www >..rfc -editor .org /info /rfc3261 - [RFC4353]
-
Rosenberg, J., "A Framework for Conferencing with the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)", RFC 4353, DOI 10
.17487 , , <https:///RFC4353 www >..rfc -editor .org /info /rfc4353 - [RFC6120]
-
Saint-Andre, P., "Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP): Core", RFC 6120, DOI 10
.17487 , , <https:///RFC6120 www >..rfc -editor .org /info /rfc6120 - [RFC7262]
-
Romanow, A., Botzko, S., and M. Barnes, "Requirements for Telepresence Multistreams", RFC 7262, DOI 10
.17487 , , <https:///RFC7262 www >..rfc -editor .org /info /rfc7262 - [RFC7667]
-
Westerlund, M. and S. Wenger, "RTP Topologies", RFC 7667, DOI 10
.17487 , , <https:///RFC7667 www >..rfc -editor .org /info /rfc7667
Acknowledgements
The authors thank all the CLUErs for their precious feedback and support -- in particular, Paul Kyzivat, Christian Groves, and Scarlett Liuyan.¶