RFC Errata


Errata Search

 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

Found 3 records.

Status: Verified (3)

RFC 792, "Internet Control Message Protocol", September 1981

Source of RFC: Legacy
Area Assignment: int

Errata ID: 577
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Beren Sanders
Date Reported: 2002-09-09

On p. 16 and 18, it says:

   IP Fields:

   Type

It should say:

   ICMP Fields:

   Type

Notes:

On page 16, the section 'Timestamp and Timestamp Reply Messages' has
the header 'IP Fields:' - first mentioned after the graph and then
again after 'Addresses'. The second one should actually be 'ICMP
Fields:'. This error also occurs in the discussion of the
'Information Request and Information Reply Message' on page 18.

The second 'IP Fields:' section of these two sets of message
descriptions are really talking about fields in the ICMP header not
the IP header.

[This report was updated 2009-03-11 to specify the original and corrected text, as indicated by Nikolai Malykh.]

Errata ID: 576
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Arun Darlie Koshy
Date Reported: 2004-03-26

In the Introduction, fourth paragraph, it says:

Also ICMP messages are only sent about errors in handling fragment zero of
fragemented datagrams.  (Fragment zero has the fragment offeset equal
zero).

It should say:

Also ICMP messages are only sent about errors in handling fragment zero of
fragmented datagrams.  (Fragment zero has the fragment offset equal
zero).

Errata ID: 6458
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Ivan Panchenko
Date Reported: 2021-03-07
Verifier Name: Erik Kline
Date Verified: 2021-03-07

Section [Page 17] says:

      If the time is not available in miliseconds or cannot be provided

It should say:

      If the time is not available in milliseconds or cannot be provided

Notes:

Misspelled "milliseconds".

Report New Errata