RFC Errata


Errata Search

 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

Found 2 records.

Status: Verified (1)

RFC 7601, "Message Header Field for Indicating Message Authentication Status", August 2015

Note: This RFC has been obsoleted by RFC 8601

Source of RFC: appsawg (art)

Errata ID: 4671
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Ale
Date Reported: 2016-04-18
Verifier Name: Alexey Melnikov
Date Verified: 2016-08-25

Section 2.3 says:

   The "ptype" in the ABNF above indicates the general type of property
   being described by the result being reported, upon which the reported
                                             ^^^^^
   result was based.  Coupled with the "property", which is more
   specific, they indicate from which particular part of the message the
   reported data were extracted.
                    ^^^^


It should say:

   The "ptype" in the ABNF above indicates the general type of property
   being described by the value being reported, upon which the reported
                                             ^^^^^
   result was based.  Coupled with the "property", which is more
   specific, they indicate from which particular part of the message the
   reported "pvalue"s were extracted.
                    ^^^^^^^^


Notes:

The original text can be understood in multiple ways, depending on the meaning attributed to the term "result". The corrected text I submit is one of the possible interpretations. Note that if the first appearance of the term is assumed to be the ABNF "result", then ptype becomes an attribute of method, thereby setting a limit of one ptype per resinfo, as coincidentally it actually is.

Status: Reported (1)

RFC 7601, "Message Header Field for Indicating Message Authentication Status", August 2015

Note: This RFC has been obsoleted by RFC 8601

Source of RFC: appsawg (art)

Errata ID: 5435
Status: Reported
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Peter Occil
Date Reported: 2018-07-23

Section 2.2 says:

resinfo = [CFWS] ";" methodspec [ CFWS reasonspec ]
               *( CFWS propspec )

It should say:

resinfo = [CFWS] ";" methodspec [ CFWS reasonspec ]
            [ CFWS 1*propspec ]

Notes:

Since propspec includes optional CFWS at end, parsing the current version of resinfo will result in at most one propspec even if methodspec is followed by more than one propspec.

Report New Errata



Advanced Search