RFC Errata


Errata Search

 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

RFC 7139, "GMPLS Signaling Extensions for Control of Evolving G.709 Optical Transport Networks", March 2014

Note: This RFC has been updated by RFC 7892

Source of RFC: ccamp (rtg)
See Also: RFC 7139 w/ inline errata

Errata ID: 3945
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Fred Gruman
Date Reported: 2014-04-02
Verifier Name: Adrian Farrel
Date Verified: 2014-04-11

Section 7 says:

For the ingress node, a Path message with SE style SHOULD also be
sent for decreasing the ODUflex bandwidth.

It should say:

For the ingress node, a Path message with SE style MUST also be
sent for decreasing the ODUflex bandwidth.

Notes:

Section 7 requires that Shared Explicit (SE) MUST be used at the beginning when creating a resizable ODUflex connection. Thus, the SE style MUST also be used when signaling for bandwidth increase or decrease. The increase procedure mandates the use of SE style; however, the decrease procedure uses SHOULD. The decrease procedure should also make the SE signaling mandatory.

This change, that looks to be a change of substance, has been verified with the authors to be an editorial issue that was caused by not keeping the paragraphs in synch.

Report New Errata



Advanced Search