RFC Errata


Errata Search

 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

Found 3 records.

Status: Held for Document Update (3)

RFC 5857, "IKEv2 Extensions to Support Robust Header Compression over IPsec", May 2010

Source of RFC: rohc (tsv)

Errata ID: 2274
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2010-05-19
Held for Document Update by: Lars Eggert

Section 3.1, pg.4 says:

[[ first paragraph on page 4: ]]
 
  A new Notify Message Type value, denoted ROHC_SUPPORTED, indicates
   that the Notify payload is conveying ROHC channel parameters (Section
|  4).

It should say:

   A new Notify Message Type value, denoted ROHC_SUPPORTED, indicates
   that the Notify payload is conveying ROHC channel parameters (Section
|  3.1.2).

Notes:

Rationale:
Section 4 of RFC 5857 is "Security Considerations"; the various ROHC
parameters that can/must be signaled via this Notify payload are
described in Section 3.1.2 of RFC 5857.

Errata ID: 2275
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2010-05-19
Held for Document Update by: Lars Eggert

Section 3.1.2, pg.8 says:

[[ first paragraph of description for ROHC_ICV_LEN, on mid-page 8: ]]

      [...]
      If no ROHC_ICV_LEN attribute is sent at all or if the ROHC_ICV_LEN
|     is larger than the length of the ICV of selected algorithm, then
      the full ICV length as specified by the ROHC_INTEG algorithm MUST
      be sent.

It should say:

      [...]
      If no ROHC_ICV_LEN attribute is sent at all or if the ROHC_ICV_LEN
|     is larger than the length of the ICV of the selected algorithm,
      then the full ICV length as specified by the ROHC_INTEG algorithm
      MUST be sent.

Notes:

Rationale: missing definite article

Errata ID: 3320
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Nikolai Malykh
Date Reported: 2012-08-16
Held for Document Update by: Wes Eddy

Section 3.1.2 says:

   This section describes five ROHC Attribute Types: MAX_CID,
   ROHC_PROFILE, ROHC_INTEG, ROHC_ICV_LEN, and MRRU.  The value
   allocated for each ROHC Attribute Type is specified in Section 4.

It should say:

   This section describes five ROHC Attribute Types: MAX_CID,
   ROHC_PROFILE, ROHC_INTEG, ROHC_ICV_LEN, and MRRU.  The value
   allocated for each ROHC Attribute Type is specified in Section 5.

Notes:

Section 4 of RFC 5857 is "Security Considerations". Values of ROHC Attribute Types listed in Section 5.

Report New Errata



Advanced Search