RFC Errata
Found 3 records.
Status: Verified (1)
RFC 5780, "NAT Behavior Discovery Using Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN)", May 2010
Note: This RFC has been updated by RFC 8553
Source of RFC: behave (tsv)
Errata ID: 2844
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: John Selbie
Date Reported: 2011-06-25
Verifier Name: Wes Eddy
Date Verified: 2011-06-27
Section 7.5 says:
RESPONSE-PORT is a 16-bit unsigned integer in network byte order followed by 2 bytes of padding. Allowable values of RESPONSE-PORT are 0-65536.
It should say:
RESPONSE-PORT is a 16-bit unsigned integer in network byte order followed by 2 bytes of padding. Allowable values of RESPONSE-PORT are 0-65535.
Notes:
The 16-bit unsigned int range is 0-65535 (0x0000 - 0xffff). 65536 can't be represented inside a a 16-bit.
Status: Held for Document Update (2)
RFC 5780, "NAT Behavior Discovery Using Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN)", May 2010
Note: This RFC has been updated by RFC 8553
Source of RFC: behave (tsv)
Errata ID: 2939
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: John Selbie
Date Reported: 2011-08-17
Held for Document Update by: Wes Eddy
Date Held: 2012-04-27
Section 9.1 says:
Section 9.1 ... 0x802c: OTHER-ADDRESS
Notes:
The document contradicts itself, one place (section 7.4) saying that OTHER-ADDRESS has the same value as CHANGED-ADDRESS did, and the other place (section 9.1) giving a new value, which matches the IANA registry. The statement explaining why it has the same value (which it doesn't) should be removed.
Errata ID: 4327
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Xinbang Hu
Date Reported: 2015-04-03
Held for Document Update by: Spencer Dawkins
Date Held: 2016-01-13
Section 3.6 says:
This test apples to UDP and TCP, but not TLS over TCP connections.
It should say:
This test applies to UDP and TCP, but not TLS over TCP connections.
Notes:
"apples" should be "applies".