RFC Errata
Found 6 records.
Status: Verified (2)
RFC 5559, "Pre-Congestion Notification (PCN) Architecture", June 2009
Source of RFC: pcn (tsv)
Errata ID: 3164
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Bob Briscoe
Date Reported: 2012-03-23
Verifier Name: Wes Eddy
Date Verified: 2012-04-27
Section 4.2 says:
o Police - police, by dropping any packets received with a DSCP indicating PCN transport that do not belong to an admitted flow. (A prospective PCN-flow that is rejected could be blocked or admitted into a lower-priority behaviour aggregate.)
It should say:
o Police - drop or re-mark to a lower-priority behaviour aggregate i) packets received with a DSCP indicating PCN transport that do not belong to an admitted flow and ii) packets that are part of a flow that asked to be admitted as a PCN-flow but was rejected.
Notes:
In the original text the first sentence contradicts the parenthesis. It could be interpreted to mean that dropping is the only allowed policing action, whereas the parenthesis shows that downgrading was also considered appropriate.
Also the original text used the term 'blocking' as a different action to 'downgrading', whereas Section 3.6 just above this text has said '"Blocking" means it is dropped or downgraded to a lower-priority behaviour aggregate,...'
Errata ID: 3565
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Michael Welzl
Date Reported: 2013-03-26
Verifier Name: Martin Stiemerling
Date Verified: 2013-04-10
Section 10.2 says:
[Moncaster09-1] Moncaster, T., Briscoe, B., and M. Menth, "Baseline Encoding and Transport of Pre-Congestion Information", Work in Progress, May 2009.
It should say:
[Moncaster09-1] Moncaster, T., Briscoe, B., and M. Menth, "Baseline Encoding and Transport of Pre-Congestion Information", RFC 5696, November 2009.
Status: Held for Document Update (4)
RFC 5559, "Pre-Congestion Notification (PCN) Architecture", June 2009
Source of RFC: pcn (tsv)
Errata ID: 1973
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2009-12-21
Held for Document Update by: Lars Eggert
Section 4.1, Fig. 4 says:
| +---------+ Result | +->|Threshold|-------+ | | | Meter | | | | +---------+ V +----------+ +- - - - -+ | +------+ | BA | | | | | | Marked Packet =>|Classifier|==>| Dropper |==?===============>|Marker|==> Packet Stream | | | | | | | Stream +----------+ +- - - - -+ | +------+ | | +---------+ ^ | | | Excess | | | +->| Traffic |-------+ | | Meter | Result | +---------+
It should say:
| +---------+ Result | +->|Threshold|-------+ | | | Meter | | | | +---------+ V +----------+ +- - - - -+ | +------+ | BA | | | | | | Marked Packet =>|Classifier|==>| Dropper |==?===============>|Marker|==> Packet Stream | | | | | | | Stream +----------+ +- - - - -+ | +------+ | | +---------+ ^ | | | Excess | | | +->| Traffic |-------+ | | Meter | Result | +---------+
Notes:
Rationale: Misalignment in Figure, breaking arrow lines.
(Keep for update!)
Errata ID: 1974
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2009-12-21
Held for Document Update by: Lars Eggert
Section 6.3, pg.36 says:
4. PCN-flows may have different precedence, but the applicability of | the PCN mechanisms for emergency use (911, GETS (Government | Telecommunications Service), WPS (Wireless Priority Service), MLPP (Multilevel Precedence and Premption), etc.) is out of scope.
It should say:
4. PCN-flows may have different precedence, but the applicability of the PCN mechanisms for emergency use (911, GETS (Government | Emergency Telecommunications Service), WPS (Wireless Priority Service), MLPP (Multilevel Precedence and Premption), etc.) is out of scope.
Notes:
Rationale:
Incomplete expansion of acronym "GETS":
important word "Emergency" missing.
Errata ID: 1975
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2009-12-21
Held for Document Update by: Lars Eggert
Section 10.2, pg.45 says:
[Hancock02] Hancock, R. and E. Hepworth, "Slide 14 of 'NSIS: An | Outline Framework for QoS Signalling'", May 2002, <h | ttp://www-nrc.nokia.com/sua/nsis/interim/ nsis-framework-outline.ppt>.
It should say:
[Hancock02] Hancock, R. and E. Hepworth, "Slide 14 of 'NSIS: An | Outline Framework for QoS Signalling'", May 2002, | <http://www-nrc.nokia.com/sua/nsis/interim/ nsis-framework-outline.ppt>.
Notes:
Rationale:
Unpleasant and unexpected line folding -- tool (xml2rfc) issue?
Errata ID: 1976
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2009-12-21
Held for Document Update by: Lars Eggert
Section 10.2, pg.46 says:
[Kumar01] Kumar, A., Rastogi, R., Silberschatz, A., and B. Yener, "Algorithms for Provisioning Virtual Private Networks in the Hose Model", Proceedings ACM SIGCOMM | (ITC16), , 2001.
It should say:
[Kumar01] Kumar, A., Rastogi, R., Silberschatz, A., and B. Yener, "Algorithms for Provisioning Virtual Private Networks in the Hose Model", Proceedings ACM SIGCOMM | (ITC16), August 2001.