RFC Errata


Errata Search

 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

Found 2 records.

Status: Verified (1)

RFC 4948, "Report from the IAB workshop on Unwanted Traffic March 9-10, 2006", August 2007

Source of RFC: IAB

Errata ID: 1024

Status: Verified
Type: Editorial

Reported By: Stephane Bortzmeyer
Date Reported: 2007-09-15
Verifier Name: Olaf Kolkman
Date Verified: 2008-11-16

Section 4.3.2 says:

for example, a bug in the BIND packet was discovered

It should say:

for example, a bug in the BIND package was discovered

Notes:

from pending

Status: Rejected (1)

RFC 4948, "Report from the IAB workshop on Unwanted Traffic March 9-10, 2006", August 2007

Source of RFC: IAB

Errata ID: 3504

Status: Rejected
Type: Editorial

Reported By: Bharat Joshi
Date Reported: 2013-03-01
Rejected by: Russ Housley
Date Rejected: 2013-04-25

Section 2.4 says:

As a result, not only is there no limit to what a host may do, but
also there is no trace after the event of what a host may have done.

It should say:

As a result, not only there is no limit to what a host may do, but 
also there is no trace of what a host may have done.

Notes:

1. 'is' in the first part of the sentence is not at the correct place.

2. 'after the event' is making the sentence improper.

Report New Errata



Search RFCs
Advanced Search
×