RFC Errata
Found 4 records.
Status: Verified (4)
RFC 4941, "Privacy Extensions for Stateless Address Autoconfiguration in IPv6", September 2007
Note: This RFC has been obsoleted by RFC 8981
Source of RFC: ipv6 (int)
Errata ID: 3240
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2007-10-12
Verifier Name: Brian Haberman
Date Verified: 2012-06-01
Section 3.3 says:
4. When creating a temporary address, the lifetime values MUST be derived from the corresponding prefix as follows: * Its Valid Lifetime is the lower of the Valid Lifetime of the public address or TEMP_VALID_LIFETIME. * Its Preferred Lifetime is the lower of the Preferred Lifetime of the public address or TEMP_PREFERRED_LIFETIME - DESYNC_FACTOR.
It should say:
4. When creating a temporary address, the lifetime values MUST be derived from the corresponding prefix as follows: * Its Valid Lifetime is the lower of the Valid Lifetime of the prefix and TEMP_VALID_LIFETIME. * Its Preferred Lifetime is the lower of the Preferred Lifetime of the prefix and TEMP_PREFERRED_LIFETIME - DESYNC_FACTOR.
Notes:
The language of RFC 4941 has been 'upgraded' from RFC 3041 by
replacing the confusing language related to "global addresses"
by correctly speaking about "prefixes" when referring to
information obtained in RA Prefix Options.
Unfortunately, in one place this 'upgrade' has been missed.
Errata ID: 4763
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Jiri Bohac
Date Reported: 2016-08-04
Verifier Name: Erik Kline
Date Verified: 2021-01-28
Section 5 says:
DESYNC_FACTOR -- A random value within the range 0 - MAX_DESYNC_FACTOR. It is computed once at system start (rather than each time it is used) and must never be greater than (TEMP_VALID_LIFETIME - REGEN_ADVANCE).
It should say:
DESYNC_FACTOR -- A random value within the range 0 - MAX_DESYNC_FACTOR. It is computed once at system start (rather than each time it is used) and must never be greater than (TEMP_PREFERRED_LIFETIME - REGEN_ADVANCE).
Notes:
At various places in the RFC, DESYNC_FACTOR is used in a calculation like (TEMP_PREFERRED_LIFETIME - DESYNC_FACTOR) or (TEMP_PREFERRED_LIFETIME - REGEN_ADVANCE - DESYNC_FACTOR). It needs to be smaller than (TEMP_PREFERRED_LIFETIME - REGEN_ADVANCE) for the result of these calculations to be larger than zero. It's never used in a calculation together with TEMP_VALID_LIFETIME.
Errata ID: 998
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2007-10-12
Verifier Name: Brian Haberman
Date Verified: 2012-06-01
Section 6 says:
The second paragraph of Section 6 refers to the Source Address Selection API Extension without giving any reference. The related Internet-Draft in the meantime has been published as RFC 5014, less than two weeks after RFC 4941. It would have been useful to place a pointer to that work-in-progress (or the RFC, if publication were coordinated).
Errata ID: 3241
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2007-10-12
Verifier Name: Brian Haberman
Date Verified: 2012-06-01
Section 3.4 says:
When a temporary address becomes deprecated, a new one MUST be generated. This is done by repeating the actions described in Section 3.3, starting at step 3). [...]
It should say:
When a temporary address becomes deprecated, a new one MUST be generated. This is done by repeating the actions described in Section 3.3, starting at step 4). [...]
Notes:
The bullets in Section 3.3 have been renumbered from RFC 3041,
necessitated by the insertion of a new bullet as #2.
In an internal reference in Section 3.4, this change has not been
reflected accordingly.